As I often do on my days off, I was perusing a six month old article out of 'The Nation' where some idiot blathers about how we need to repair the damage done to our democracy by Bush II. I was reminded of an article from Sept 2004 in the Economist, in which they bitch about how our democracy was broken then. The Economist cleverly dubbed our government, 'Pyongyang on the Potomac'. The Economist found it funny that our Congress had an incumbency rate of over 90% for a number of years. They thought that gerrymandering was abhorrent and reduced our integrity as a democracy.
I do think gerrymandering is ridiculous, but I disagreed with their sentiment and wrote this letter to the Economist.
"This publication suffers from an endemic flaw in contemporary Western thinking. As illustrated by the Economists’ condemnation of lack of democracy in Hong Kong, Egypt, Russia, and the United States, too many people accept as inimitable truth that democracy is the only acceptable form of government to maintain a society with freedom and civil liberties. Need anyone point further than the Patriot Act to illustrate that a democracy can just as easily curtail civil liberties as the most corrupt post-Soviet kleptocracy? The voters were never the ones to stand against unlawful search and seizure. The federal court system, an appointed organization largely independent of democracy, saved the voters from curtailing their own civil liberties. Less democracy may be exactly what America needs.
Moreover, it is naïve to think that democracy is the most desirable government for regions where there is no history of democratic institutions. Since 1918, Russia, ruled by Tsars for nearly 1,000 years, has consistently found new ways to ruin attempts at democracy as President Putin has recently demonstrated. France, which had little experience with democracy prior to July 1789, slipped into a very bloody revolution, an insult to the enlightenment ideals proclaimed by the revolutionaries. To date, France has been through five republics. The United States have only had some success (the Economist has aptly pointed out American failings) because the House of Burgesses had been founded over 150 years before July 4, 1776. For Americans, democracy was simply the way things had been done from the beginning."
It didn't get published. Maybe it was too long or maybe they thought I was stupid. Either way, I can't understand why so few people see this fact. Elected leaders aren't always that smart or well intended. Saddam Hussein, Adolf Hitler, Hugo Chavez, Napoleon Bonaparte, Oliver Cromwell, and many other monsters were democratically elected (initially). A democracy killed Socrates, a democracy caused both World Wars, a democracy enslaved people based on race, a parliamentary democracy supported the occupation of a third of the world, a democracy created and supported apartheid, and a democracy (ours) interned its own citizens without charge. In light of this, someone tell me why George Bush said democracy was, "a gift from God." Then the left turns around saying, "we need to fix our democracy." With the above track record, I'd say we're doing pretty well. All we've done recently is ignore multiple genocides, incite Arab violence, support Israel's use of violence against them, ruin the lives of some poppy farmers in Afghanistan, and make everyone hate us.
However, the answer to our problems isn't more democracy. The answer is less democracy. The word demokratia in Greek originally had a negative connotation. It more or less meant mob rule. Isonomia (equality under the law) is what the designers of democracy themselves sought. What we need is laws and actions that make sense. By make sense, I mean that the laws and acts of the US should not be geared toward temporarily placating the fickle gripes and appetites of the majority. They should be geared toward long term goals that create a healthier, more educated, introspective, and disciplined society. Sometimes that sort of law requires pissing off voters. Therefore, I have but one question to ask you. How many politicians are willing to piss off voters for their own good?
-Eric Ewing